# 3.2: Mass Flow Rates at Entrances and Exits

There are many problems for which the control volume, V , contains only a single entrance and a single exit and the flux at the interfacial area is zero. This is the type of problem considered in Example 3.1 in terms of the word statement given by Eq. 3‐8, and we need to be certain that no confusion exists concerning Eq. 3‐8 and the rigorous form given by Eq. 3‐29. For systems that contain only a single entrance and a single exit, it is convenient to express Eq. 3‐29 as d

dV

vn dA

v

n dA

(3‐30)

dt V

A entrance

A exit

in which we have made use of the relations

v n   v n , at the entrance , v n v n , at the exit (3‐31)

The form of the macroscopic mass balance given by Eq. 3‐30 is analogous to the word statement given by Eq. 3‐8 which we repeat here as

 time rate of change 

 rate at which 

rate at which 

of the mass contained   mass enters the   mass leaves the  (3‐32)

in the control volume 

control volume

control volume

There are several convenient representations for the terms that appear in Eqs. 3‐30 and 3‐32, and we present these forms in the following paragraph.

3.2.1 Convenient forms

The mass in a control volume can be expressed in terms of the volume V and the volume average density,  , which is defined by 1

 

dV

(3‐33)

V V

In terms of  , the accumulation in a fixed control volume takes the form d

d

dV V

(3‐34)

dt

dt

V

To develop a convenient form for the mass flux, we make use of Eq. 3‐23 to express the volumetric flow rate at an exit as

Single component systems

57

dA Qexit

v n

(3‐35)

ex

A it

Given this result, we can define an average density at an exit,  b,exit , according to

v

n dA

1

A



v

b,exit

n dA

(3‐36)

Q

exit

exit

v dA

A exit

n

A exit

This average density is sometimes referred to as the “bulk density”, and that is the origin of the subscript b in this definition. In addition,  b,exit is sometimes referred to as the “cup mixed density” since it is the density that one would measure by collecting a cup of fluid at the outlet of a tube and dividing the mass of fluid by the volume of fluid. Equations 3‐35 and 3‐36 also apply to an entrance, thus we can use these results to express Eq. 3‐30 in the form d

V

 

 

b,entrance

en

Q trance

b,exit

exit

Q

(3‐37)

dt

If the process is steady, the volume average density will be independent of time and this result simplifies to



Q

 

Q

(3‐38)

b,entrance

entrance

b,exit

exit

If the density is constant over the surfaces of the entrance and exit, the average values in this result can be replaced with the constant values and one recovers the mass balance given by Eq. 5 in Example 3.1.

In addition to expressing the mass flux in terms of a density and a volumetric flow rate, there are many problems in which it is convenient to work directly with the mass flow rate. We designate the mass flow rate by m

 and represent

the terms on the right hand side of Eq. 3‐30 according to

vn dA   m

,

v

entrance

n dA

e

m xit

(3‐39)

A entrance

A exit

This leads to the following form of the macroscopic mass balance for one entrance and one exit

## Chapter 3

d

V

m

 

entrance

m exit

(3‐40)

dt

and when the process is steady this reduces to

m

 

entrance

m exit

(3‐41)

When systems have more than one entrance and more than one exit, the mass flow rates can be expressed in precisely the manner that we have indicated by Eqs. 3‐37 through 3‐39 however, one must be careful to include the flows at all entrances and exits.

EXAMPLE 3.2. Polymer coating

As an example of the application of Eq. 3‐29, we consider the process of coating a polymer optical fiber with a polymer film. The process is similar to that discussed in Example 3.1; however, in this case, we wish to determine the coating thickness rather than the fiber diameter. To determine the thickness of the polymer film, we make use of the control volume illustrated in Figure 3.2. In constructing this control volume, we have followed the rules given earlier which are listed here along with the commentary that is appropriate for this particular problem.

Rule I. Construct a cut (a portion of the surface area A ) where information is given.

In this case we have constructed a cut at a position downstream from the take‐up wheel where the thickness of the polymer coating will normally be specified and the velocity of the polymer film will be equal to the velocity of the optical fiber. Thus we have created a cut where information is normally given.

Rule II. Construct a cut where information is required.

In this case we have created a cut at the entrance where the coating polymer comes in contact with the optical polymer since we need to know the volumetric flow rate of the polymer that will produce the desired thickness of the coating. Thus we have created a cut where information is required.

Rule III. Join these cuts with a surface located where v n is known.

Single component systems

59

In this case we have joined the two cuts along the polymer‐polymer interface on the basis of the assumption that v n  0 at this interface.

Thus we have joined these cuts with a surface located where v n is known.

Rule IV. Be sure that the surface specified by Rule III encloses regions in which volumetric information is either

given or required.

For this particular problem, there is no volumetric information either given or required, and this rule is automatically satisfied.

Figure 3.2. Polymer coating process

We begin our analysis of the coating operation by assuming that the process operates at steady‐state so that Eq. 3‐29 reduces to

## Chapter 3

  dA  0 ,

(1)

v n

A

When no mass transfer occurs at the portion of A located at the glass-polymer interface, we need only evaluate the area integral at the entrance and exit and Eq. 1 reduces to

v n dA

v n dA  0

(2)

A entrance

A exit

At this point we can follow Example 3.1 to obtain

  Q

Q

(3)

o

o 

 1 1

polymer

polymer

At the exit, the velocity of the polymer coating is determined by the take-up wheel and is identical to the velocity of the optical fiber. This leads to

Q

 ( A )

v

(4)

1 

1 polymer

1 take‐up

polymer

wheel

in which ( A )

represents the area of the annular region occupied by 1 polymer

the coating polymer. Use of Eq. 4 in Eq. 3 allows one to determine the cross‐sectional area of the polymer coating to be

Q

o

o

A

polymer

(5)

1 polymer

 

v

1 

1

polymer

take‐up

wheel

This expression can be used to determine the coating thickness in terms of the operating variables, and this will be left as an exercise for the student.

In both Examples 3.1 and 3.2, we illustrated applications of the macroscopic mass balance in order to determine the characteristics of a steady fiber spinning and coating process. Many practical problems are transient in nature and can be analyzed using the complete form of Eq. 3‐29. The consumption of propane gas in rural areas represents an important transient problem, and we analyze this problem in the next example.

Single component systems

61

EXAMPLE 3.3. Delivery schedule for propane

In rural areas where natural gas is not available by pipeline, compressed propane gas is used for heating purposes. During the winter months, one must pay attention to the pressure gauge on the tank in order to avoid running out of fuel. Deliveries, for which there is a charge, are made periodically and must be scheduled in advance. The system under consideration is illustrated in Figure 3.3a. The volume of the tank is Figure 3.3a. Tank of compressed propane

250 gallons, and when full it contains 750 kg of propane at a pressure of 95

psi (gauge). If the gas is consumed at a rate of 400 scf/day, we need to know whether a monthly or a bi‐monthly delivery is required. Here the abbreviation, scf, represents standard cubic feet, and the word standard means that the pressure is equivalent to 760 mm of mercury and the temperature is 273.16 K. A standard cubic foot represents a convenience unit (see Sec. 2.4) for the number of moles and this is easily demonstrated for the case of an ideal gas. Given the pressure ( p  one atmosphere ), the temperature ( T  273 . 16 K ), and the volume ( V  one cubic foot), one can use the ideal gas law to determine the number of moles according to n pV RT

If the gas under consideration is not an ideal gas, one must use the appropriate equation of state (Sandler, 2006) to determine what is meant by a standard cubic foot.

The propane inside the tank illustrated in Figure 3.3a is an equilibrium mixture of liquid and vapor, and we have illustrated this situation in Figure 3.3b. There we have shown a control volume that has been constructed on the following basis:

## Chapter 3

I. A cut has been made at the exit of the tank where information is given.

II. There is no required information that would generate another cut.

III. The surface of the control volume is located where v n is known.

IV. The surface specified by III encloses the region for which volumetric information is required.

The proportions of liquid and vapor inside the tank are not known; however, we do know the initial mass of propane in the tank and we are given (indirectly) the average mass flow rate leaving the tank. Our analysis of the transient behavior of this system is based on the macroscopic mass balance given by

d

dV

  dA  0

v n

(1)

dt V

A

for which the fixed control volume, V , is illustrated in Figure 3.3b.

Figure 3.3b. Control volume for analysis of the propane tank Regardless of how the propane is distributed between the liquid and vapor phase, the mass of propane in the tank is given by

Single component systems

63

 mass of 

 propane  

dV m

(2)

in the tank

V

and Eq. 1 takes the form

dm

  dA

(3)

dt

v n

0

A exit

On the basis of the analysis in Sec. 3.2, we can express this result as dm

 

Q

 0

exit

exit

(4)

dt

We are given that the volumetric flow rate is 400 standard cubic feet per day and this can be converted to SI units to obtain

3

3

ft

3

m

m

 400

exit

Q

2

2 8

. 3 10 

11 3

. 2

(5)

3

day

ft

day

In order to determine the density of the propane vapor leaving the tank, we first recall that one mole of gas at standard conditions occupies a volume of 22.42 liters. This leads to the molar concentration of propane given by 3

mol

L

 100 cm 

mol

c

44 . 60

(6)

propane

3

3

3

22.42 L

10 cm

m

m

The molecular mass (see Sec. 2.1.1) of propane is given in Table A2 of Appendix A, and use of that molecular mass allows us to determine the mass density of the propane as

c

MW

propane

propane

propane

(7)

mol

g

g

 44 . 60

 44 . 097

 1967

3

3

m

mol

m

The mass flow rate at the exit of the control volume illustrated in Figure 3.3b can now be calculated as

m

 

Q

 22 , 266 g/day  22 2

. 7 kg / day

(8)

exit

exit

exit

Use of this result in Eq. 4 leads to the governing differential equation for the mass in the tank

64